Kant – Submission Form of Individual Communication to Treaty Body (01 March 2025)

SUBMISSION FORM OF INDIVIDUAL COMMUNICATIONS TO TREATY BODIES

Please provide answers to all areas of the form. Submissions in languages other than English, French, Russian or Spanish will not be processed. The completed form should enable treaty bodies to determine the nature and scope of your complaint for the purposes of registration. If needed, please include as an attachment any additional, chronologically-ordered factual information. (Maximum word limit of this attachment: 10,000). Please check the Guidelines for submission of individual communications to treaty bodies for further assistance on how to complete this form.

  1. Name of Committee to which the communication is submitted:
    Human Rights Committee
  2. State party or States parties concerned:
    Australia
  3. Complainant:
    First name Jan
    Family name Kant
    Date of birth 07/10/1988
    Nationality Australian
  4. Contact details of complainant:
    Email jmjarosz01@gmail.com
    Phone number Click or tap here to enter text.
    Address 3/33 Bewdley Street, Ormond VIC 3204
    Australia
  5. Victim (if different from complainant):
    First name
    Family name

1

Date of birth
Nationality

  1. Counsel or other representative (if the complainant is represented):
    First name
    Family name
    Email
    Phone number
    Address
  2. Would you like for the complainant / victim’s name to be anonymized in an eventual decision by the Committee?
    ☒ Yes ☐ No
  3. Have you submitted the same matter under another procedure of regional / international investigation or settlement?
    ☒ Yes ☐ No

If the answer is yes, please indicate the procedure or body, the date of submission, the authors and the claims invoked, and the decision adopted

I made several submissions to OHCHR in 2024. OHCHR gave me the complaint numbers UR/CAT/24/AUS/13 and UR/CCRP/24/AUS/22. OHCHR has since refused to bring about resolution of UR/CAT/24/AUS/13 and UR/CCRP/24/AUS/22. The High Court of Australia twice already refused to consider my application(s) for orders commanding the High Commissioner for Human Rights to do things necessary to bringing about resolution of UR/CAT/24/AUS/13 and UR/CCRP/24/AUS/22.

  1. Are you requesting interim measures (to avoid irreparable harm to the complainant/victim) or measures of protection (to avoid harm or reprisals against the complainant/victim and/or family members or representatives)?
    ☒ Yes ☐ No

If yes, indicate what kind of specific measures and justify the request. [word limit: 400]

2

Dispose of the secret police. They continue to be my problem.

  1. Facts. Please provide a summary of the main facts of the case, in chronological order, including the dates, and information on administrative/judicial remedies. Please focus on the facts of the individual case. Information referring to a general context should be included only if relevant, and as brief as possible. Do not include allegations of violations (these should be included in para. 11 below)Include information on domestic remedies: Please describe, in chronological order, each step taken by the victim(s) to raise their claims before courts and/or administrative authorities. Please describe the date and content of each submission, the authority to which it was submitted, the date of the decision, and the reason(s) for the decision. If domestic remedies have not been exhausted, please state why [word limit 2,500]
  2. There is a secret police in Australia.
  3. Australian courts are not independent.
  4. Whoever commands the secret police also commands the courts.
  5. The secret police seek to collect from me information other than information concerning crimes I may have committed or might commit in future
  6. The secret police seek to collect from me information about my attitudes and opinions, including information regarding sexist, racist or nationalist attitudes or opinions I might have.
  7. The secret police seek to collect from me information about potential means of diverting my efforts to seek remedy against them and whoever commands them, including information about potential efficacy of money/assets and women as means of such diversion.
  8. The secret police act to prevent their own prosecution.
  9. The courts are evasive of matters concerning conspiracy of politicians and intelligence agencies.
  10. The courts are evasive of matters concerning excess of national security.
  11. The courts are evasive of matters concerning false information produced to me by the secret police.
  12. The courts are evasive of matters concerning human rights violation by persons acting in official capacities.
  13. The courts are evasive of matters concerning incompetence of domestic authorities.
  14. The courts are evasive of claims of their own misconduct.
  15. The Federal Court of Australia on 23 January 2025 handed down a judgement now apparently instance of a pattern of evasion.

3

  1. The High Court of Australia on 04 February 2025 handed down a judgement now apparently instance of a pattern of evasion.
  2. The Federal Court of Australia on 12 February 2025 handed down a judgement with which emerged the pattern of evasion.
  3. The High Court of Australia on 14 February 2025 refused a second time to consider an application for “special leave” to appeal from the 23 Jan 2025 judgement which included a challenge to constitutional validity of a law prohibiting such appeal.
  4. The Federal Court of Australia in February 2025 twice refused to hear my application(s) for orders requiring the Australian Human Rights Commissioner and sundry do things necessary to bring forth prosecution of the secret police and whoever commands them.
  5. My best theory on information available to me is all the preceding takes place in some political process which involves two or more groups with competing interests jointly acting to prove things to each other.
  6. Documentation is enclosed in annexure to this submission form. A reference to “JMK-35” in the relevant submissions document in a reference to “JMK-1” in the 12 Feb 2024 affidavit.
  7. Claim. Please explain how and why you consider that the facts and circumstances described violate your rights/ the victim(s)’ rights. Please specify which rights you consider to have been violated (if possible, identify the articles under the relevant treaty) [word limit 600]
  8. My Article 2.3(a) right to effective remedy is violated.
  9. My Article 2.3(b) right to determination of my claims to remedy by competent authorities is violated.
  10. My Article 14.1 right of bringing proceedings before a competent and independent court is violated.
  11. My Article 14.1 right to fair hearing in matters before a competent and independent court is violated.
  12. My Article 14.1 right of equality before the courts is violated.
  13. My Article 17.1 right not to be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with my privacy is violated.
  14. My Article 17.2 right to protection of the law against arbitrary or unlawful interference with my privacy is violated.
  15. My Article 19.1 right of holding opinions without interference is violated.
  16. The rights set forth in Universal Declaration of Human Rights are recognized in the Covenant by effect of Article 5.

5

  1. My right in Article 3 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to security of person is violated.
  2. My right in Article 7 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to equality before the law if violated.
  3. My right in Article 7 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to equal protection of the law is violated.
  4. My right in Article 8 Universal Declaration of Human Rights to effective remedy for acts violating fundamental rights granted me by the law is violated.
  5. The secret police in Australia are above the law.
  6. Whoever commands the secret police in Australia is above the law.
  7. There is no domestic remedy.
  8. Date, place and signature
    Date
    Place
    Signature of the complainant(s) and victim(s) (if different and able to sign):
    Signature of the Counsel (if the complainant is represented):

Note: You will need to send two files:

  • The word document file (does not need signature) AND
  • The signed document scanned or photographed
  1. List of documents
    Please make sure all documents are ordered by date, are numbered consecutively, and are clearly labeled (Example: Annex 1 (Complaint to District Court-4 Jun 2020); Annex 2 – (Decision of District Court-8 Jul 2020)).

☒ Decisions of domestic courts (and administrative authorities) on your claim as well as executive summaries of such decisions if they are not in one of the four working languages indicated above

5

☐ Complaints to and decisions by any other procedure of international investigation or settlement
☒ Any documentation or other corroborating evidence you possess that substantiates your communication, including medical or psychological reports, if relevant.
☐ Relevant national legislation, if applicable.

  1. How to submit individual communications
    Please send the completed application form and attached documentation by email to:
    petitions@ohchr.org
    If it is impossible to submit the case electronically, please explain why and send in paper (not exceeding 20 single-sided pages) to:
    Petitions and Urgent Actions Section
    OHCHR
    Palais des Nations
    Avenue de la Paix 8-14
    1211 Geneva
    Switzerland.
    No paper complaints will be processed unless a justification is provided. Please do not include originals, but only copies. No documents will be returned.

6

Download